banned again?

footballleg123 · Post by **footballleg123** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:56 pm

lol y did u kick me this time. it said

yoinkster is kicking dbuk because: we arent stupid ... but it seems you are, tragically this means we will have to let you go at this point. "You have just been erased"

even tho im sharing some stuff now, so i cant c y u kicked me
cheers

Post by **astropoint** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 10:05 pm

You were showing up as a 0B sharer still.
Unbanned again...

Zeus · Post by **Zeus** » Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:23 am

You might just get kicked in the future for spelling like a chav retard. Keep that in mind.

echelon · Post by **echelon** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:13 pm

Zeus wrote:You might just get kicked in the future for spelling like a chav retard. Keep that in mind.

I think we should actually make this a rule

Post by **astropoint** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:14 pm

See rules...

5. Anybody using excessive amounts of leetspeak, txtspk, LolCats or CAPITALS (ie. you being an idiot on main chat) will be kicked. You're at University, act like you have a writing age above that of a 13 year old.

echelon · Post by **echelon** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:15 pm

astropoint wrote:See rules...

5. Anybody using excessive amounts of leetspeak, txtspk, LolCats or CAPITALS (ie. you being an idiot on main chat) will be kicked. You're at University, act like you have a writing age above that of a 13 year old.

heh obv I've not looked at the rules in way too long and totally forgot that was already in there

tho it doesnt actually specify chav talk...

Post by **astropoint** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:18 pm

I was counting it as coming under txtspeak or whatever since they appear to be nearly the same. Failing that, 'being an idiot'.

echelon · Post by **echelon** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:20 pm

astropoint wrote:I was counting it as coming under txtspeak or whatever since they appear to be nearly the same. Failing that, 'being an idiot'.

wouldn't call it txtspeak but yes it does fall under the "being an idiot" category